Skip to content
Jangara Bliss

Background

About Jangara

I'm a senior computer engineering student at Fort Lewis College (math and business minors), and most of my work sits at the same junction: taking a capable model and making it do something in the physical world. Right now that means leading sim-to-real research on the Booster K1 humanoid under Dr. Yiyan Li — a system where you describe a task in natural language and the robot executes it. The architecture is two-tiered: a vision-language model handles perception and task planning at about 1 Hz, while a reinforcement-learned locomotion policy trained in NVIDIA Isaac Sim runs the legs at 50 Hz.

Before the humanoid, the pattern was already set. I led a four-person team building an autonomous 18-DoF hexapod that competed in NASA's Colorado Robotics Challenge at the Great Sand Dunes. I spent a summer under Dr. Kevin Wedeward reviving two dormant industrial robots — tracing a Sawyer's boot failure to a dead CMOS battery, rebuilding its OS from a corrupted encrypted SSD — and then built a YOLOv8 thermal-inspection pipeline on top of them. Under Dr. Matthew Welz I shipped a data platform that Fort Lewis's radio station staff use daily, then prototyped its applied-AI layer. Across three faculty labs, the lesson kept repeating: the model is rarely the hard part; the seams are.

The question that drives me is Moravec's paradox — why the hardest problems in AI turned out to be the ones a toddler solves effortlessly, and how we close the gap between what robots do in simulation and what they do in the real world. That's the problem I want to spend a career on: robots that generalize to new tasks in the physical world the way foundation models generalize in language.

I also come from an entrepreneurship track — co-founder and president of FLC's Entrepreneurial Ventures Association (New Registered Student Organization of the Year), a Goldman Sachs Emerging Leaders alum, and a business minor by design. I care about the sectors where physical AI could matter most: housing, food and agriculture, logistics, healthcare, manufacturing, and space infrastructure. Graduate school is how I get the theoretical depth to build in those spaces at a level I can't reach yet.

Portrait of Jangara Bliss
Durango, Colorado

Technical interests

  • Machine learning
  • Computer vision & perception
  • Reinforcement learning
  • Embodied AI & robot learning
  • Simulation & sim-to-real
  • Multimodal / vision-language models
  • Robotics software
  • Embedded systems
  • AI products

Why graduate school

The systems I want to build next need more than working code — they need stronger foundations in optimization, learning theory, perception, and control than an undergraduate curriculum provides. A terminal master's is the direct path to that depth.

Deployment taught me what I don't know. Running a vision-language model on a real humanoid surfaces questions — about robustness, evaluation, and sim-to-real transfer — that I can currently engineer around but want to actually understand. Moravec's paradox isn't an abstraction when you watch it happen at 50 Hz.

Long-term, I intend to build physical-AI products, likely as a technical founder. Graduate study is leverage for that: research taste, harder problems, and an environment of people operating at the level I want to reach.

Education

Fort Lewis College

Computer Engineering · Minors in Mathematics & Business Administration

B.S. expected May 2027

GPA 3.64 (cumulative, strong upward trend — most recent semester 4.0, Dean's List) · 3.8 upper-division

Graduate study focus

Applying to terminal master's programs — AI, CS, ECE, robotics — enrolling after a May 2027 B.S. in Computer Engineering.

Domestic U.S. applicant · Colorado resident.

Builder ethos

  • Deployment realism — a demo that only works in simulation is a hypothesis, not a result.
  • Evidence discipline — claims on this site link to artifacts, or they're labeled as pending.
  • Full-stack range — comfortable from VLM inference and RL training down to ROS nodes, firmware, and board-level hardware.
  • Product judgment — entrepreneurship training treated as responsibility: build for real constraints and real users, not for applause.

Honors & awards

  • 2nd place — Physics & Engineering Symposium, Fort Lewis College (robotic PV hotspot inspection), Sep 2025
  • Dean's List — 4.0 GPA most recent semester
  • Katz School of Business Leadership Award — signed by the FLC president and dean, Apr 2024
  • New Registered Student Organization of the Year — Entrepreneurial Ventures Association (as president & co-founder), 2023–24
  • Certificate of Entrepreneurial Education — NMSU Arrowhead Center Studio G program, Feb 2024

Leadership & service

  • President & co-founder, Entrepreneurial Ventures Association — grew the organization from zero, led an 8-person executive team, ran a campus pitch competition allocating $1,500 in micro-grants, and brought the NASA Venture Program to campus (2023–24)
  • Student representative, Strategic Implementation Committee — one of four students working alongside the college president, trustees, and deans on executing the FLC 2025–2030 strategic plan (2025–26)
  • Team lead, NASA Colorado Robotics Challenge — led a 4-person team end-to-end on the autonomous hexapod (2025–26)
  • STEM tutor — mathematics, physics, and programming (2024–25)
  • Volunteer, Children's Cancer Research Fund — six years managing the chip competition at a memorial golf tournament that has raised $175k+

Values

  • Build things that survive contact with the real world
  • Evidence over claims
  • Take initiative; keep drama out of the work
  • Build skills and systems that keep long-term options open
  • Respect complexity; ship anyway